Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Brin. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Brin. Sort by date Show all posts

Wednesday, January 22, 2014

Anachronism

1-21-14 (no text) (saved in doc)
1-22-14 * added
1-23-14 scroll down for edit(**) comments
1-24-14

Pop Four?

Randi Rhodes:  Defender and Explainer of Obamanomics?
Norman Goldman:  Radical Middle?

Ed Schultz: Ed Head of the People?
Mike Malloy: Contrary Brin
The Less Than Pentagonal File

4 word [.]
 
==============================================

No apologies (*) to Mike Malloy, nor insult to Contrary Brin*, but maybe the mechanics(or dimanics) of the parallel points. Akin to Newton’s orbit(**). i.e. 3-body problem. And even deeper Hegelian remarks to Terral, in regard to not getting there yet.  i.e. accidental reference under Post-Doc Terral nature of the point. Parallels do not tangent.

Further ow[!]
parallels-meet-religion-and-nationalism-in-the-early
when-the-parallels-meet-and-talk
where-parallels-meet.html

1-22-14
 * Nor less regard for Thom(:) Hartmann or Rachel(:) Maddow:
Time is a funny thing.  The fourth dimension?  What about perpendicular to the 3?  But then there is the parallel of not having time to follow every tangent let alone parallels. 

**1-23-14   links titled and morphed, lines 4 and 6 added. Link(or line)5 actually read or rubric's fit ?
 



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

[.] = lame punctuashuns[!]
i.e. prologue / foreword (^)
 
(:) more to insert and POGO [!] ~[foot note]
 
(*) the sequal? WaPo Slate?

(^)1-24-14  i.e. prologue / foreword
Also 4 links added for 4 original personalities.(Andrea Mitchell /

Monday, January 05, 2015

Perspectivism

A preemptive thought intruded before I could go further. Where are the women?  I will leave that for another time.
So it is with only slight further ado, that I note the heading, as the only context for the mentioning** of a few blogs. 

Contrary Brin
Pax On Both Houses

From Gender to Genre:
Darwins-god
A forth perspective.*

The first two especially, respect style and perspectivism, not to mention** subject matter. 
The third is a stretch on a few counts*, let alone complexity. A runner-up for 4th might be:

*still in processing

1-6-15
[Pardon the spacing anomalies.]
Re:runner-ups. 
^*^ 3rd and 4th anachronism.** Counter-popperism? 
** asteri(s)cal anachronism ^context~mentioning^
(s) type-O?/ asterical(spell check in-operable[!]?)
[R.I.P. Not a shot at irony[!], police labor strife*** works where justice fails?
*** not a strike @ hard work, they do[!](?) 





Thursday, May 07, 2015

Tolerance (,^) Thugs(...).

...and the two-way street [!] ?

A. (Salon)
SPOILER ALERT( Provocative Lede-In Here) It really confounded me when Governor Mike Pence defended the two-way street of tolerance. I don’t think it is really, but now I wonder if “thug” may be of the same confoundation(sic). It may explain things if you read this, one hopes.

B. (Youtube)
Segregated Zone(Only the tolerant are advised to enter. RATED: Undeleted nor bleeped.)

C.D. Fb
E. Contrary Brin

[...]
N F R Y
[Pre-QCON? Wack a mole *ideology* of immoderation?  ManyKeyKneeZ'an?  Kaufmann/FukuYama? Popper Straussian ?]

* two ends against the Garden or Candide?

(^) comma inserted [tangents, taxes or Texas?] 
(and belated addendums @F^uk^u^Yama)

(5-8-15)